On 2015/2/11 23:25, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 10:43:13 PM Fu, Zhonghui wrote: >> From 2626594c03ca3b9884dd44073385c36f99a3651d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Zhonghui Fu <zhonghui...@linux.intel.com> >> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 16:20:21 +0800 >> Subject: [PATCH] PM-Trace: add pm-trace support for suspending phase > Can you please avoid putting the above header lines into your patches? > > The only one that may be necessary is the From: line, but that's only > needed if you submit from a different address. > > Also please don't send To: mailing lists. Use CC instead. In fact, there > should be *one* address in the To: field when you're submitting a patch: > The address of the maintainer you want to apply the patch for you. Thanks for your guidance, and I will re-send this patch.
> >> Occasionally, the system can't come back up after suspend/resume >> due to problems of device suspending phase. This patch make >> PM_TRACE infrastructure cover device suspending phase of >> suspend/resume process, and the information in RTC can tell >> developers which device suspending function make system hang. > Do you have any examples of when this helped and no other debug methods did? > > It seems odd to me that no one has ever asked for this for several years and > now you need it. We ever run into some system hang during suspending some devices on BayTrail-T platform such as DMA, audio, etc. So, extending PM-Trace to suspend phase should be helpful. Thanks, Zhonghui > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
