Currently, readlink() and follow_link() for the symbolic links in
/proc/<pid>/fd/* will return -EACCES in the case where looking up the
task finds that it does not exist.

This patch inlines the logic from proc_fd_access_allowed() into these
two functions such that they will return -ESRCH if the lookup in /proc
races with the task exiting. Since those were the only two callers of
that helper function, it also removes it.

Signed-off-by: Calvin Owens <calvinow...@fb.com>
---
 fs/proc/base.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 3f3d7ae..308fcbd 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -485,23 +485,6 @@ static int proc_pid_syscall(struct seq_file *m, struct 
pid_namespace *ns,
 /*                       Here the fs part begins                        */
 /************************************************************************/
 
-/* permission checks */
-static int proc_fd_access_allowed(struct inode *inode)
-{
-       struct task_struct *task;
-       int allowed = 0;
-       /* Allow access to a task's file descriptors if it is us or we
-        * may use ptrace attach to the process and find out that
-        * information.
-        */
-       task = get_proc_task(inode);
-       if (task) {
-               allowed = ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ);
-               put_task_struct(task);
-       }
-       return allowed;
-}
-
 int proc_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr)
 {
        int error;
@@ -1375,10 +1358,21 @@ static void *proc_pid_follow_link(struct dentry 
*dentry, struct nameidata *nd)
 {
        struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
        struct path path;
-       int error = -EACCES;
+       int error = -ESRCH;
+       int allowed = 0;
+       struct task_struct *task;
 
        /* Are we allowed to snoop on the tasks file descriptors? */
-       if (!proc_fd_access_allowed(inode))
+       task = get_proc_task(inode);
+       if (task) {
+               allowed = ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ);
+               put_task_struct(task);
+       } else {
+               goto out;
+       }
+
+       error = -EACCES;
+       if (!allowed)
                goto out;
 
        error = PROC_I(inode)->op.proc_get_link(dentry, &path);
@@ -1417,12 +1411,23 @@ static int do_proc_readlink(struct path *path, char 
__user *buffer, int buflen)
 
 static int proc_pid_readlink(struct dentry * dentry, char __user * buffer, int 
buflen)
 {
-       int error = -EACCES;
+       int error = -ESRCH;
+       int allowed = 0;
+       struct task_struct *task;
        struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
        struct path path;
 
        /* Are we allowed to snoop on the tasks file descriptors? */
-       if (!proc_fd_access_allowed(inode))
+       task = get_proc_task(inode);
+       if (task) {
+               allowed = ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ);
+               put_task_struct(task);
+       } else {
+               goto out;
+       }
+
+       error = -EACCES;
+       if (!allowed)
                goto out;
 
        error = PROC_I(inode)->op.proc_get_link(dentry, &path);
-- 
1.8.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to