On 02/14, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > > On Sat, 2015-02-14 at 21:57 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Perhaps... but PF_KTHREAD looks self-documented too ;) > > Well the idea was to standardize how we check for a kthreads, as opposed > to improving readability or such. Just a suggestion.
I understand, and of course I won't argue if you add a helper. I meant that checking for a kthread is already standardized: flags & PF_KTREAD. Not sure this needs a helper, but I again I won't argue. Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
