On Mon, 2015-02-16 at 13:24 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> With old Kernels there was a bug in x86 where any unknown
> memory chip type would come up BUSY when calling
> request_mem_region_exclusive().
> 
> So for pmem to work with old Kernels and real NvDIMM chips
> we have a new Kconfig option CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PMEM_IGNORE_REQUEST_MEM_RET.
> 
> People have been running with hacked up pmem that will ignore
> the return code from request_mem_region_exclusive. So here it is
> official
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <b...@plexistor.com>

I'm confused - I thought that this behavior was fixed by patch 1/3?
With that patch this memory reservation should not fail, correct?

If so, why do we need this patch?

> ---
>  drivers/block/Kconfig | 12 ++++++++++++
>  drivers/block/pmem.c  | 11 +++++++----
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/block/Kconfig b/drivers/block/Kconfig
> index 3b3200f..10879b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/block/Kconfig
> @@ -430,6 +430,18 @@ config BLK_DEV_PMEM_USE_PAGES
>         to other devices in the system, then you must say "Yes" here.
>         If unsure leave as Yes.
>  
> +config BLK_DEV_PMEM_IGNORE_REQUEST_MEM_RET
> +     bool "Ignore the return code from request_mem_region_exclusive"
> +     depends on BLK_DEV_PMEM
> +     help
> +       In Old Kernels type-12 Memory type which is used by NvDIMM
> +       chips Comes out busy when calling request_mem_region_exclusive,
> +       because of a bug.
> +       If this option is set to "yes". The pmem will ignore the
> +       failure, and continue as usual. If you have an old Kernel and
> +       a real NvDIMM chip you must say yes here.
> +       (Ignored if BLK_DEV_PMEM_USE_PAGES=y)
> +
>  config CDROM_PKTCDVD
>       tristate "Packet writing on CD/DVD media"
>       depends on !UML
> diff --git a/drivers/block/pmem.c b/drivers/block/pmem.c
> index 9eb7ffe..f84d033 100644
> --- a/drivers/block/pmem.c
> +++ b/drivers/block/pmem.c
> @@ -197,10 +197,12 @@ int pmem_mapmem(struct pmem_device *pmem)
>  
>       res_mem = request_mem_region_exclusive(pmem->phys_addr, pmem->size,
>                                              "pmem");
> -     if (!res_mem) {
> +     if (unlikely(!res_mem)) {
>               pr_warn("pmem: request_mem_region_exclusive phys=0x%llx 
> size=0x%zx failed\n",
> -                        pmem->phys_addr, pmem->size);
> -             return -EINVAL;
> +                     pmem->phys_addr, pmem->size);
> +#ifndef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_PMEM_IGNORE_REQUEST_MEM_RET
> +             return -EBUSY;
> +#endif
>       }
>  
>       pmem->virt_addr = ioremap_cache(pmem->phys_addr, pmem->size);
> @@ -211,7 +213,8 @@ int pmem_mapmem(struct pmem_device *pmem)
>       return 0;
>  
>  out_release:
> -     release_mem_region(pmem->phys_addr, pmem->size);
> +     if (res_mem)
> +             release_mem_region(pmem->phys_addr, pmem->size);
>       return err;
>  }
>  



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to