+ Linus.
I'm sure he'll save something to say about it :-)
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:58:15AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> We have eager and lazy fpu modes, introduced in:
>
> 304bceda6a18 x86, fpu: use non-lazy fpu restore for processors supporting
> xsave
>
> The result is rather messy. There are two code paths in almost all of the
> FPU code, and only one of them (the eager case) is tested frequently, since
> most kernel developers have new enough hardware that we use eagerfpu.
>
> It seems that, on any remotely recent hardware, eagerfpu is a win:
> glibc uses SSE2, so laziness is probably overoptimistic, and, in any
> case, manipulating TS is far slower that saving and restoring the full
> state.
>
> To try to shake out any latent issues on old hardware, this changes
> the default to eager on all CPUs. If no performance or functionality
> problems show up, a subsequent patch could remove lazy mode entirely.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c b/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c
> index 0de1fae2bdf0..1928c8f34ce5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/xsave.c
> @@ -637,8 +637,8 @@ static void __init xstate_enable_boot_cpu(void)
> prepare_fx_sw_frame();
> setup_init_fpu_buf();
>
> - /* Auto enable eagerfpu for xsaveopt */
> - if (cpu_has_xsaveopt && eagerfpu != DISABLE)
> + /* Auto enable eagerfpu for everyone */
> + if (eagerfpu != DISABLE)
> eagerfpu = ENABLE;
>
> if (pcntxt_mask & XSTATE_EAGER) {
> --
> 2.1.0
>
>
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
