Tomas Szepe <sz...@pinerecords.com> wrote:
> > I tried to reproduce this without success so far on my RTL8168d/8111d
> > device.
> > I've been running 40 parallel netperf TCP_STREAM tests (1gbit) for the
> > last 5 hours and so far I saw no watchdog tx timeouts.
> >
> > I'll keep this running for a day or so to see if it just takes more time
> > to trigger.
>
> So, how's this coming along? Don't you think the patch should be reverted
> until the problem is diagnosed/understood/fixed?
Sorry.
David, please consider reverting
1e918876853aa85435e0f17fd8b4a92dcfff53d6
(r8169: add support for Byte Queue Limits)
and
0bec3b700d106a8b0a34227b2976d1a582f1aab7
(r8169: add support for xmit_more)
I cannot reproduce any hangs (tried for 2days with 40 parallel
netperfs using both 100mbit and 1gbit receiver).
And I don't see anything wrong with the change either.
Seems like some revisions of the HW are just dodgy?
I hate giving up, but I have no means to diagnose this any further.
Even reporter says it doesn't affect all of his r8169 nics.
So I think the change is correct per se, but might be revealing some
HW/firmware bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
