On Sun, 22 Feb 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote: > I am making specific technical arguments, but you attempted to redirect > my very specific arguments towards 'differences in philosophy' and > 'where to draw the line'. Lets discuss the merits and brush them aside > as 'philosophical differences' or a made up category of 'consistency > models'. > > Anyway, let me try to reboot this discussion back to technological > details by summing up my arguments in another mail.
Sounds good, thanks. Don't get me wrong -- I am not really opposing your solution (because it's of course quite close to what kgraft is doing :p ), but I'd like to make sure we understand each other well. I still have to think a little bit more about how to handle kthreads properly even in your proposed solution (i.e. how exactly is it superior to what kgraft is currently doing in this respect). We'd have to go through all them anyway, and make them parkable, right? Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
