Am 23.02.2015 um 21:34 schrieb Guenter Roeck: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 09:27:01PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >> Am 23.02.2015 um 20:10 schrieb Guenter Roeck: >>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 08:00:51PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>>> The Kconfig options for the asm9260 timer is wrong as it can be selected by >>>> another platform with allyes config and thus leading to a compilation >>>> failure >>>> as some non arch related code is pulled by the compilation. >>>> >>>> Fix this by having the platform Kconfig to select the timer as it is done >>>> for >>>> the others drivers. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org> >>> >>> Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <li...@roeck-us.net> >>> >> >> the thing is, this SoC or this company has no own IP cores. All of them >> are from other companies and providers, including this timer. This is >> why all modules for this SoC are selectable. >> > Maybe the modules should be selected by the architectures using the IP cores ?
At the moment of pushing patches to arch/arm, maintainers preferred to have minimalistic Kconfig. > Either case, we'll need _some_ fix upstream, whatever is acceptable for the > maintainer. What is with initial white list patch? -- Regards, Oleksij
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
