On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 19:50 +0200, Ameen Ali wrote:
> Transmitting asynchronously on all the network devices available we will
> notice the following behaviour:
> a) The instruction "if (sd->completion_queue) {" saves on a CPU register the
> pointer value (register contents is used for the comparison)
> b) The interupt is disabled (using "local_irq_disable")
> c) when the content of "clist" is updated, the register is used, instead of
> re-read the "completion_queue" variable.
>
> So, when a low-level tx interrupt arrives after the latching of
> "completion_queue", but before "local_irq_disable",
> the value stored in "clist" reflect the situation before low-level tx
> interrupt, resulting in a sk_buff leak
> ---
> net/core/dev.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
> index 8f9710c..db3e59e 100644
> --- a/net/core/dev.c
> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
> @@ -3413,7 +3413,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_rx_ni);
>
> static void net_tx_action(struct softirq_action *h)
> {
> - struct softnet_data *sd = this_cpu_ptr(&softnet_data);
> + volatile struct softnet_data *sd = &__get_cpu_var(softnet_data);
>
> if (sd->completion_queue) {
> struct sk_buff *clist;
Seems real bug is elsewhere. This is becoming a FAQ.
Which arch are you using, and which compiler ?
volatile are highly discouraged in favor of ACCESS_ONCE, READ_ONCE(),
WRITE_ONCE() : read
Documentation/volatile-considered-harmful.txt:19:safe
local_irq_disable() acts as a barrier the compiler should reload the
value from memory.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
