Hi Ezequiel, On 25/02/2015 19:17, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > On 02/25/2015 02:04 PM, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >>> >>> My conclusions about these registers are based on experimental data. The >>> documentation is very sparse, but the Thermal Manager Control and Status >>> Register looks like the preferred register given the way it is laid out in >>> the >>> public spec. >> >> Ezequiel, >> >> as you worked on this do you know why we used the Thermal Sensor Status >> Register >> instead of the Thermal Manager Control and Status Register ? >> My first guess is that the giving the name of the registers the 1st one made >> more sens to use for a thermal sensor. >> > > Actually, we based this driver in the vendor bootloader. The specs weren't > of much use back then. >
Thanks for your prompt feedback. So we don't have much more information about the sensor. :( I will try to get information from Marvell. Tyler, In the meantime could you double check your values? The temperature on my board seemed broken on my board. If needed I can check on an other board. By the way on which board/product did you try it? Thanks, Gregory -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
