On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Denys Vlasenko
<vda.li...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Denys Vlasenko
> <vda.li...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:59 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net>
>> wrote:
>> In addition to my previous tests, I ran my home machine with
>> patched kernel. Unfortunately, it works for me :(
>>
>> Will try on yet another machine.
>
> And voila, it does happen on another machine :)
>
> I'm debugging it right now. Looks like 64-bit syscalls just stop working
> at some point in new processes. That is, existing process is alive and well,
> but children get SEGV after fork (most likely on any syscall64 they do,
> not after fork per se. They eventually manage to kill themselves -
> not trivial when exit syscall isn't working either - by tripping on HLT insn).
>
> 32-bit syscalls (int 80) continue to work. Fork, exec, whatever you want.
> I have static 32-bit busybox binary and everything works there.
>
> Also, any 64-bit process which was under strace continues to work correctly,
> including forks and execs.
>
> This points towards some bug on fast path sysret64 code. Looking for it.
audit=0 makes crashes disappear.
I found the problem. If syscall_trace_enter_phase1 returns 0,
I restore %rax from pt_regs->ax, but should restore it from
pt_regs->orig_ax:
call syscall_trace_enter_phase1
test %rax, %rax
jnz tracesys_phase2 /* if needed, run the slow path */
- RESTORE_C_REGS /* else restore clobbered regs */
+ RESTORE_C_REGS_EXCEPT_RAX /* else restore clobbered regs */
+ movq ORIG_RAX-ARGOFFSET(%rsp),%rax
jmp system_call_fastpath /* and return to the fast path */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
