From: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>

RESTORE_EXTRA_REGS + RESTORE_C_REGS looks small, but it's
a lot of instructions (fourteen). Let's reuse them.

[I changed the labels.  In vda's version of this patch, paranoid_exit_restore
 was paranoid_restore1 and paranoid_exit_no_swapgs was paranoid_restore.
 This still isn't great, but I think it's a lot better.  --Andy]

Link: 
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
CC: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
CC: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
CC: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
CC: X86 ML <[email protected]>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
CC: Will Drewry <[email protected]>
CC: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 10 ++++------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
index b4469ed2b30f..e5cad016cb60 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
@@ -1282,15 +1282,13 @@ ENTRY(paranoid_exit)
        DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
        TRACE_IRQS_OFF_DEBUG
        testl %ebx,%ebx                         /* swapgs needed? */
-       jnz paranoid_restore
+       jnz paranoid_exit_no_swapgs
        TRACE_IRQS_IRETQ 0
        SWAPGS_UNSAFE_STACK
-       RESTORE_EXTRA_REGS
-       RESTORE_C_REGS
-       REMOVE_PT_GPREGS_FROM_STACK 8
-       INTERRUPT_RETURN
-paranoid_restore:
+       jmp paranoid_exit_restore
+paranoid_exit_no_swapgs:
        TRACE_IRQS_IRETQ_DEBUG 0
+paranoid_exit_restore:
        RESTORE_EXTRA_REGS
        RESTORE_C_REGS
        REMOVE_PT_GPREGS_FROM_STACK 8
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to