On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:25, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 09:37 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > I have to say, this whole thread has been pretty damn worthless in
> > > general in my not-so-humble opinion.
> >
> > This thread has really gone OT, but to revisit the original issue for a
> > bit, are you still unwilling to consider leaving the default HZ at 1000
> > for 2.6.13?
>
> Yes. I see absolutely no point to it until I actually hear people who have
> actually tried some real load that doesn't work. Dammit, I want a real
> user who says that he can noticeable see his DVD stuttering, not some
> theory.

Disclaimer - This is not proof of a real world dvd stuttering, simply a 
benchmarked result. My code may be crap, but then the real apps out there may 
also be.

Results from interbench v0.21 
(http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/interbench/interbench-0.21.tar.bz2)

2.6.13-rc1 on a pentium4 3.06

HZ=1000:
--- Benchmarking Audio in the presence of loads ---
        Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU  % Deadlines Met
None      0.012 +/- 0.00196    0.021             100            100
Video      1.28 +/- 0.509       2.01             100            100
X         0.289 +/- 0.578          2             100            100
Burn      0.014 +/- 0.002      0.023             100            100
Write     0.025 +/- 0.0349      0.49             100            100
Read       0.02 +/- 0.00383    0.052             100            100
Compile   0.023 +/- 0.00752    0.054             100            100
Memload   0.222 +/- 0.892       9.04             100            100

--- Benchmarking Video in the presence of loads ---
        Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU  % Deadlines Met
None      0.012 +/- 0.00169    0.023             100            100
X          2.55 +/- 2.37        18.7             100           75.8
Burn       1.08 +/- 1.06        16.7             100           88.2
Write     0.224 +/- 0.215       16.7             100           97.8
Read      0.019 +/- 0.00354    0.059             100            100
Compile    4.55 +/- 4.53        17.6             100           57.5
Memload     1.3 +/- 1.34        51.5             100             88


HZ=250:
--- Benchmarking Audio in the presence of loads ---
        Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU  % Deadlines Met
None      0.011 +/- 0.00152    0.022             100            100
Video     0.157 +/- 0.398       3.62             100            100
X           1.3 +/- 1.82        4.01             100            100
Burn      0.014 +/- 0.00142    0.026             100            100
Write     0.022 +/- 0.0125     0.092             100            100
Read      0.021 +/- 0.00366    0.048             100            100
Compile    0.03 +/- 0.0469     0.559             100            100
Memload   0.144 +/- 0.681       8.05             100            100

--- Benchmarking Video in the presence of loads ---
        Latency +/- SD (ms)  Max Latency   % Desired CPU  % Deadlines Met
None          5 +/- 4.99        16.7             100             54
X          9.98 +/- 8.94        20.7             100           31.2
Burn       16.6 +/- 16.6        16.7             100          0.167
Write      4.11 +/- 4.08        16.7             100           60.8
Read       2.55 +/- 2.53        16.7             100           73.8
Compile    15.6 +/- 15.6        17.7             100            3.5
Memload    2.91 +/- 2.92        45.4             100           72.5


Audio did show slightly larger max latencies but nothing that would be of 
significance.

On video, maximum latencies are only slightly larger at HZ 250, all the 
desired cpu was achieved, but the average latency and number of missed 
deadlines was significantly higher.

Cheers,
Con

Attachment: pgp55H3zXUdbU.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to