Hello, Vikas. On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:34:16AM -0800, Vikas Shivappa wrote: > This cgroup subsystem would basically let the user partition one of the > Platform shared resource , the LLC cache. This could be extended in future
I suppose LLC means last level cache? It'd be great if you can spell out the full term when the abbreviation is first referenced in the comments or documentation. > to partition more shared resources when there is hardware support that way > we may eventually have more files in the cgroup. RDT is a generic term for > platform resource sharing. > For more information you can refer to section 17.15 of Intel SDM. > We did go through quite a bit of discussion on lkml regarding adding the > cgroup interface for CAT and the patches were posted only after that. > This cgroup would not interact with other cgroups in the sense would not > modify or add any elements to existing cgroups - there was such a proposal > but was removed as we did not get agreement on lkml. > > the original lkml thread is here from 10/2014 for your reference - > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/10/16/568 Yeap, I followed that thread and this being a separate controller definitely makes a lot more sense. > I > >take it that the feature implemented is too coarse to allow for weight > >based distribution? > > > Could you please clarify more on this ? However there is a limitation from > hardware that there have to be a minimum of 2 bits in the cbm if thats what > you referred to. Otherwise the bits in the cbm directly map to the number of > cache ways and hence the cache capacity .. Right, so the granularity is fairly coarse and specifying things like "distribute cache in 4:2:1 (or even in absolute bytes) to these three cgroups" wouldn't work at all. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/