On 27/02/15 14:38, David Miller wrote: > From: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:19:02 -0800 > >> If you can take Petri's change now and Jaedon then resubmits on top of >> that change, would that be acceptable? > > I think it should go the other way around.
I was not quite sure whether Jaedon's change could be suitable for 'net' considering how many lines of code it involved changing, but ok, that's better that way. > > The bug should be fixed in 'net'. > > Then Petri can resubmit the cleanup relative to that once I merge > 'net' into 'net-next'. It's a cleanup so it's a net-next change. > Sure. -- Florian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
