On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 16:21 +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > The DRA7x has more peripherals with DMA requests than the sDMA can handle: > 205 vs 127. All DMA requests are routed through the DMA crossbar, which can > be configured to route selected incoming DMA requests to specific sDMA > request. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@ti.com> > --- > drivers/dma/Kconfig | 4 + > drivers/dma/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c | 191 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 196 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c
A simple observation follows. > diff --git a/drivers/dma/Kconfig b/drivers/dma/Kconfig > index a874b6ec6650..dfe72a0f46dc 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/dma/Kconfig > @@ -245,6 +245,9 @@ config TI_EDMA > Enable support for the TI EDMA controller. This DMA > engine is found on TI DaVinci and AM33xx parts. > > +config TI_DMA_CROSSBAR > + bool > + This is a bool symbol... > config ARCH_HAS_ASYNC_TX_FIND_CHANNEL > bool > > @@ -330,6 +333,7 @@ config DMA_OMAP > depends on ARCH_OMAP > select DMA_ENGINE > select DMA_VIRTUAL_CHANNELS > + select TI_DMA_CROSSBAR if SOC_DRA7XX > > config DMA_BCM2835 > tristate "BCM2835 DMA engine support" > diff --git a/drivers/dma/Makefile b/drivers/dma/Makefile > index f915f61ec574..bc12f9a4e62b 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/Makefile > +++ b/drivers/dma/Makefile > @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_EP93XX_DMA) += ep93xx_dma.o > obj-$(CONFIG_DMA_SA11X0) += sa11x0-dma.o > obj-$(CONFIG_MMP_TDMA) += mmp_tdma.o > obj-$(CONFIG_DMA_OMAP) += omap-dma.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_TI_DMA_CROSSBAR) += ti-dma-crossbar.o ... so this file will be either not built or built into the kernel... > obj-$(CONFIG_DMA_BCM2835) += bcm2835-dma.o > obj-$(CONFIG_MMP_PDMA) += mmp_pdma.o > obj-$(CONFIG_DMA_JZ4740) += dma-jz4740.o > diff --git a/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..bf01434df46a > --- /dev/null > +++ b/drivers/dma/ti-dma-crossbar.c > @@ -0,0 +1,191 @@ > +/* > + * Copyright (C) 2015 Texas Instruments Incorporated - http://www.ti.com > + * Author: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@ti.com> > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > + * published by the Free Software Foundation. > + * > + */ > +#include <linux/slab.h> > +#include <linux/err.h> > +#include <linux/init.h> > +#include <linux/list.h> > +#include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/regmap.h> > +#include <linux/idr.h> > +#include <linux/of_address.h> > +#include <linux/of_device.h> > +#include <linux/of_dma.h> > +#include <linux/module.h> ... this includes linux/module.h ... [...] > +static struct platform_driver ti_dma_xbar_driver = { > + .probe = ti_dma_xbar_probe, > + .driver = { > + .name = "ti-dma-crossbar", > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, ... is that needed to make this work? > + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ti_dma_xbar_match), > + }, > +}; > + > +int omap_dmaxbar_init(void) > +{ > + return platform_driver_register(&ti_dma_xbar_driver); > +} > +arch_initcall(omap_dmaxbar_init); > + > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("TI DMA Crossbar"); > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfal...@ti.com>"); > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); And why are these three macros needed? By the way: there's a mismatch between the header (which is GPL v2) and the MODULE_LICENSE() string (which means GPL v2 or later). Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
