(i am subscribed nomail to lkml, please cc thx) in recent discussions about PID-1 alternatives (sysvinit, openrc, systemd, depinit) i was alerted to the idea that PID1 is to become the sole exlcusive process permitted to manage cgroups. given that, just as one specific example, depinit is only around 2,300 lines of c code, adding extra code to manage cgroups is of some concern especially in light of the general UNIX philosophy "do one thing and do it well".
to allow the general UNIX philosophy to be honoured, may i respectfully propose an additional linux kernel systemcall which permits delegation - solely and exclusively by PID1 - of the management of cgroups to one (and only one) other process, and that furthermore that the process must be an immediate child of PID1? l. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
