On 02/25/2015 03:32 PM, John Stultz wrote: > I've hosted my timekeeping tests on github for the last few years: > https://github.com/johnstultz-work/timetests > > but I suspect not too many folks have actually used them. > > I've been meaning to get them reworked and submitted into the > selftest infrastructure, but haven't had much time until > recently. So I wanted to send this out and get any feedback > to see if they might be able to get into shape for the 4.1 > merge window. > > I've added both the non-desctructive and destructive tests > (which set the time, possibly to strange values, or tries > to trigger historical issues that could crash the machine). > The destructive tests are run (as root, or with proper > privledge) via: > # make run_destructive_tests >
I quickly browsed through the tests. Looks good to me. One comment on test run scope. Since timers now include destructive tests, run_tests target should only run the non-destructive by default and destructive tests. I didn't see the run_destructive_tests in this set of changes in the timers/Makefile. Please see cpu-hotplug and memory-hotplug as examples that support default and full range tests. thanks, -- Shuah -- Shuah Khan Sr. Linux Kernel Developer Open Source Innovation Group Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shua...@osg.samsung.com | (970) 217-8978 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/