From: "Paul E. McKenney" <[email protected]>

In the past, it has been useful to enable PROVE_LOCKING without also
enabling PROVE_RCU.  However, experience with PROVE_RCU over the past
few years has demonstrated its usefulness, so this commit makes
PROVE_LOCKING directly imply PROVE_RCU.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
---
 lib/Kconfig.debug | 11 +----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index c5cefb3c009c..0766672e4c5f 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -1180,16 +1180,7 @@ config DEBUG_CREDENTIALS
 menu "RCU Debugging"
 
 config PROVE_RCU
-       bool "RCU debugging: prove RCU correctness"
-       depends on PROVE_LOCKING
-       default n
-       help
-        This feature enables lockdep extensions that check for correct
-        use of RCU APIs.  This is currently under development.  Say Y
-        if you want to debug RCU usage or help work on the PROVE_RCU
-        feature.
-
-        Say N if you are unsure.
+       def_bool PROVE_LOCKING
 
 config PROVE_RCU_REPEATEDLY
        bool "RCU debugging: don't disable PROVE_RCU on first splat"
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to