* Brian Gerst <[email protected]> wrote:
> Use the generic compat syscall audit code instead of an x86 specific
> implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 5 +--
> arch/x86/ia32/Makefile | 3 --
> arch/x86/ia32/audit.c | 43 ---------------------
> arch/x86/include/asm/unistd32.h | 2 +
> arch/x86/kernel/Makefile | 2 -
> arch/x86/kernel/audit_64.c | 82
> -----------------------------------------
> 6 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 arch/x86/ia32/audit.c
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/unistd32.h
> delete mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/audit_64.c
Nice!
Because there are many types of conversions it would be nice if the
changelog included a declaration of some sorts about what this means
precisely: 'the two implementations were 100% identical', or 'the x86
one was buggy and we now switch to the correct generic one', or 'the
only difference between the two is X, Y and Z, which is not a
problem'?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
