On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 07:31:58PM -0500, Michel Machado wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > >>We're fine with clearly marking Linux XIA as being under staging > >>as well as helping to define this review process for network stacks. > > > >With regard to staging, the code there is usually horrible and I'm > >not sure anyone really looks there, that would mitigate the review > >problem to the time when you try to get it out from there, so I'm > >not sure it brings anything. ;) > > I suggested staging as a way to incrementally review the code.
Yet you failed to at least ask the maintainer of the staging portion of the kernel, if this is a valid use of staging, and his resources... Not nice :( greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
