Hi Aneesh, On 03/03/15 12:13, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > Are we interested only in successful allocation and release ? Should we also > have the trace point carry information regarding failure ? > > -aneesh >
I think we actually can be interested in tracing allocation failures too. Thanks for the remark. Should it be smth like that? @@ -408,6 +410,8 @@ struct page *cma_alloc(struct cma *cma, int count, unsigned int align) start = bitmap_no + mask + 1; } + trace_cma_alloc(cma, page, count); + pr_debug("%s(): returned %p\n", __func__, page); return page; } and in include/trace/events/cma.h: +TRACE_EVENT(cma_alloc, <...> + TP_fast_assign( + __entry->page = page; + __entry->count = count; + ), + + TP_printk("page=%p pfn=%lu count=%lu\n", + __entry->page, + __entry->page ? page_to_pfn(__entry->page) : 0, + __entry->count) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/