2015-03-05 18:48 GMT+08:00 Roger Quadros <[email protected]>: > Hi Alex, It's Axel.
> > Since we're anyways going to fail probe for !CONFIG_OF, why do you want to > add the unnecessary device table to the kernel? > > what are you benefiting from this change? If the driver works for both dt case and non-dt case, using the ifdef CONFIG_OF guard can save a few memory for non-dt case. For dt-only driver it is not required because you cannot use the driver if !CONFIG_OF. Which means you should not build this driver at all if !CONFIG_OF unless you just want to do compile test. Regards, Axel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
