Hi Jiri, On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 05:19:54PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:07:19PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > > When perf detects data file has index table, process header part first > > and then rest data files in a row. Note that the indexed sample data is > > recorded for each cpu/thread separately, it's already ordered with > > respect to themselves so no need to use the ordered event queue > > interface. > > > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org> > > --- > > tools/perf/util/session.c | 62 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > > tools/perf/util/session.h | 5 ++++ > > 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c > > index e4f166981ff0..00cd1ad427be 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/session.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c > > @@ -1300,11 +1300,10 @@ fetch_mmaped_event(struct perf_session *session, > > #define NUM_MMAPS 128 > > #endif > > > > -static int __perf_session__process_events(struct perf_session *session, > > +static int __perf_session__process_events(struct perf_session *session, > > int fd, > > u64 data_offset, u64 data_size, > > u64 file_size, struct perf_tool *tool) > > { > > - int fd = perf_data_file__fd(session->file); > > why is 'fd' passed separatelly here? we have single file now > and the only 'file::fd' we use is in session, no?
You're right, it's a leftover from the old code. Will change. Thanks, Namhyung -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/