On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 11:44:05AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 03/06/15 10:57, Mike Turquette wrote: > > > > Uwe, > > > > Thanks for the fixes. I'm thinking of taking all three for 4.0. I also > > agree on clk_round_rate_nearest (along with a _ceil and _floor version > > as well). That's something we can do for 4.1 probably. > > > > There are currently 3 users of CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST: > > > > Loongson > > QCOM > > ST > > > > So now is probably the right time to remove the flag if we're going to > > do it. > > > > What do you think? > > > > I may have had to do divider round closest on qcom platforms because of > the problem these patches are for. I'll have to go back and look. When you do that, also check if it works for you. I think the implementation is broken for most of the cases.
Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
