Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.gar...@free-electrons.com> writes: >> I think you'll kill the zylonite board, and I'll nack it if that's the case. >> At >> least that's what happened when I tried to use onfi default values last time >> in >> barebox development. >> >> I can test your changes, but if the specific zylonite nand (ie. nand id >> 0xba20, >> ie. pxa310 embedded flash) gets broken, I'm against the removal of the legacy >> timings removal. >> > > I'm not speaking of any timing params here, but about the flash > identification. > > Which flash do you have there? The one with 0xba20 id as I said, which is AFAIK a Numonyx NAND02GR4B2C.
And of course a "READ_ID(ONFI)" doesn't work (tested)... sic ... as showed in : http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/nand-data/nanddata.html Cheers. -- Robert -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
