> On 03/08/2015 02:15 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Jeff Kirsher > > <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com> wrote: > > [...] > >> We discussed this during NetConf last week, and Don is correct that a > >> custom sysfs interface is not the way we want to handle this. We agreed > >> upon a generic interface so that any NIC is able to turn on or off VF > >> multicast promiscuous mode. > > > > Jeff, please make sure to either respond to my comments on the V2 > > thread (or better) address them for the V3 post. > > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=142441852518152&w=2 > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=142441867218183&w=2 > > I agree with you that the patch descriptions should be cleaned up and > "beefed" up for that matter. > > If/when I look to push his series of patches, I will make sure that your > concerns are addressed so that we can get a accurate changelog.
I see that the patchset should have better explanation in changelog. I will rewrite it and submit again. Jeff, are you planning to drop the patchset from your tree? I just concerned which tree I should create patches against for. thanks, Hiroshi N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z��w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a��� 0��h���i