Le 19/02/2015 10:30, Nicolas Ferre a écrit :
> When trying to request the PWM device with devm_pwm_get(), the EPROBE_DEFER
> flag is not handled properly. It can lead to the PWM not being found.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezil...@free-electrons.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.fe...@atmel.com>

Any comment on this patch?
Can we see it included during next cycle (4.1)?

(aka ping).

Bye,


> ---
>  drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c 
> b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> index 3a145a643e0d..6897f1c1bc73 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c
> @@ -274,6 +274,10 @@ static int pwm_backlight_probe(struct platform_device 
> *pdev)
>  
>       pb->pwm = devm_pwm_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>       if (IS_ERR(pb->pwm)) {
> +             ret = PTR_ERR(pb->pwm);
> +             if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +                     goto err_alloc;
> +
>               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "unable to request PWM, trying legacy 
> API\n");
>               pb->legacy = true;
>               pb->pwm = pwm_request(data->pwm_id, "pwm-backlight");
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to