On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 09:09:29AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote: > By making use of the restart_handler chain mechanism, the SLCR-based > reset mechanism can be prioritized amongst other mechanisms available on > a particular board.
Have either of you had a chance to look at this yet? On our boards we have a chip external to the SoC that manages power sequencing (and a hodgepodge of other board-level things), and we would like it to be prioritized above the SLCR reset mechanism. Previously we've just hacked up mach-zynq/common.c to not register a restart handler, and set arm_pm_restart ourselves, but that doesn't seem appropriate now that the restart chain exists. Thanks, Josh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
