3.4.106-rt132-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>

upstream-commit: 88f2b4c15e561bb5c28709d666364f273bf54b98

Oleg noticed that rtmutex_slowtrylock() has a pointless check for
rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current.

To avoid calling try_to_take_rtmutex() we really want to check whether
the lock has an owner at all or whether the trylock failed because the
owner is NULL, but the RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS bit is set. This covers
the lock is owned by caller situation as well.

We can actually do this check lockless. trylock is taking a chance
whether we take lock->wait_lock to do the check or not.

Add comments to the function while at it.

Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
Reviewed-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>

Conflicts:
        kernel/rtmutex.c
---
 kernel/rtmutex.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex.c b/kernel/rtmutex.c
index 98d563b18c0e..9eea0d8548b7 100644
--- a/kernel/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/rtmutex.c
@@ -1251,24 +1251,33 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
 /*
  * Slow path try-lock function:
  */
-static inline int
-rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+static inline int rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
 {
-       int ret = 0;
+       int ret;
 
+       /*
+        * If the lock already has an owner we fail to get the lock.
+        * This can be done without taking the @lock->wait_lock as
+        * it is only being read, and this is a trylock anyway.
+        */
+       if (rt_mutex_owner(lock))
+               return 0;
+
+       /*
+        * The mutex has currently no owner. Lock the wait lock and
+        * try to acquire the lock.
+        */
        if (!raw_spin_trylock(&lock->wait_lock))
-               return ret;
+               return 0;
        init_lists(lock);
 
-       if (likely(rt_mutex_owner(lock) != current)) {
+       ret = try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL);
 
-               ret = try_to_take_rt_mutex(lock, current, NULL);
-               /*
-                * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the lock waiters
-                * bit unconditionally. Clean this up.
-                */
-               fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
-       }
+       /*
+        * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the lock waiters bit
+        * unconditionally. Clean this up.
+        */
+       fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
 
        raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
 
-- 
2.1.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to