3.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Andrew Elble <[email protected]> commit c876486be17aeefe0da569f3d111cbd8de6f675d upstream. commit 2d4a532d385f ("nfsd: ensure that clp->cl_revoked list is protected by clp->cl_lock") removed the use of the reaplist to clean out clp->cl_revoked. It failed to change list_entry() to walk clp->cl_revoked.next instead of reaplist.next Fixes: 2d4a532d385f ("nfsd: ensure that clp->cl_revoked list is protected by clp->cl_lock") Reported-by: Eric Meddaugh <[email protected]> Tested-by: Eric Meddaugh <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Elble <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c @@ -1653,7 +1653,7 @@ __destroy_client(struct nfs4_client *clp nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid); } while (!list_empty(&clp->cl_revoked)) { - dp = list_entry(reaplist.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru); + dp = list_entry(clp->cl_revoked.next, struct nfs4_delegation, dl_recall_lru); list_del_init(&dp->dl_recall_lru); nfs4_put_stid(&dp->dl_stid); } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
