On 15 March 2015 at 04:53, Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 23:44 +0000, Ian Malone wrote: >> On 18 January 2014 at 16:14, Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> wrote: >> > On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 10:33 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 05:20 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: >> >> > Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> >> > Cc: <[email protected]> # 3.10+ >> > --- >> > arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 9 ++++++--- >> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> > >> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c >> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c >> > @@ -427,18 +427,21 @@ static int prefer_mwait_c1_over_halt(con >> >> Hi, this series of patches never seem to have made it as far as the >> mainline kernel, anyone know what needs to happen next? > > My plan is to keep on carrying it locally for as long as I run new > kernels on crusty ole core2 boxen, then stop caring about them entirely > like the rest of the planet :) >
Looks like Ingo Molnar has committed to tip which is probably a good sign, thanks all. (Have to hand this system on to someone who wont be patching kernels...) -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
