On 7/24/05, Grant Coady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 11:13:27 +0200, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > With > 2k (raw) errors in 97.something builds of 2.6.12.3, why go > looking for trouble in -mm?
Because -mm is the development tree. The things in -mm are what's eventually going to end up in mainline, so that's what you want to be testing and fixing, and it's also further ahead than 2.6.12.3 (which is esentially a dead branch except for critical fixes) so stuff may already have been fixed there that was broken in 2.6.12.3 > > > >And doing the compilations is really the trivial part of the work, the > Got to start somewhere :) > Right you are, and I for one am glad you do it. I build randconfig kernels myself to look for trouble spots, but I can't get anywhere near building 200+ configs. On a good day I may build 5 or 6 randconfigs of the latest kernel inbetween doing other things, so getting hold of the results of several hundred randconfig builds gives me a lot of material to work on that I would never have the time to gather myself. Thanks. -- Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
