On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 11:53:32AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:24:54PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Implement a latched RB-tree in order to get RCU style lookups. > > > > Cc: Michel Lespinasse <wal...@google.com> > > Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarca...@redhat.com> > > Cc: David Woodhouse <david.woodho...@intel.com> > > Cc: Rik van Riel <r...@redhat.com> > > Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com> > > Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Cc: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org> > > The caller of latch_tree_erase() is required to wait for a grace period > before freeing the erased nodes? Or am I missing something subtle here?
Correct; let me clarify this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
