OK.
I will send this patch again.
This patch will be based on https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/27/655
thanks
regards,
Daeseok Youn
2015-03-19 20:00 GMT+09:00 Joseph Qi <joseph...@huawei.com>:
> On 2015/2/28 7:51, Daeseok Youn wrote:
>> There is no error handle when ocfs2_journal_access_di() is failed.
>> And also it doesn't need to call ocfs2_dx_dir_insert() when
>> ocfs2_journal_access_db() is failed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.y...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> RESEND: this patch rebased by 1/4
>>
>> fs/ocfs2/dir.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
>> index c1ab24f..c63f2b6 100644
>> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
>> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dir.c
>> @@ -1703,15 +1703,15 @@ int __ocfs2_add_entry(handle_t *handle,
>> insert_bh,
>> OCFS2_JOURNAL_ACCESS_WRITE);
>>
>> - if (ocfs2_dir_indexed(dir)) {
>> + if (!retval && ocfs2_dir_indexed(dir))
>> retval = ocfs2_dx_dir_insert(dir,
>> handle,
>> lookup);
>> - if (retval)
>> - goto bail;
>> - }
>> }
>>
>> + if (retval)
>> + goto bail;
>> +
>> /* By now the buffer is marked for journaling */
>> offset += le16_to_cpu(de->rec_len);
>> if (le64_to_cpu(de->inode)) {
>>
> I agree with you that we should do the corresponding check.
> But I don't think we need remove the mlog as described in my previous
> mail.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
