On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 09:54:05AM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote: > Next patch series will contain all of the drivers which need to be changed. > But i think the conditional in ptp_clock.c can still in there.
Why? > Because our plan is once all the drivers are converted, i will remove the > conditional, along with the original function pointer. > Is that OK? Thanks! I want to avoid a patch series that introduces something, only to remove it later on. Sometimes you have to do that way for a complex transformation, but this case is rather simple. You can change the gettime signature in one patch, and the settime in a second patch. Thanks, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
