On 03/19/2015 04:21 PM, Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
> Document new flag V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_EXECUTE_ON_WRITE, and the new behavior
> of CH_VALUE event on VOLATILE controls.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda Delgado <ricardo.riba...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-dqevent.xml   |  7 ++++---
>  Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-queryctrl.xml | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-controls.txt          |  4 +++-
>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-dqevent.xml 
> b/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-dqevent.xml
> index b036f89..38d907e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-dqevent.xml
> +++ b/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-dqevent.xml
> @@ -318,9 +318,10 @@
>           <entry><constant>V4L2_EVENT_CTRL_CH_VALUE</constant></entry>
>           <entry>0x0001</entry>
>           <entry>This control event was triggered because the value of the 
> control
> -             changed. Special case: if a button control is pressed, then this
> -             event is sent as well, even though there is not explicit value
> -             associated with a button control.</entry>
> +             changed. Special cases: Volatile controls do no generate this 
> event;
> +             If a button control is pressed, then this event is sent as well,

Not just a button control, but any non-volatile EXECUTE_ON_WRITE control.

> +             even though there is not explicit value associated with a button
> +             control.</entry>
>         </row>
>         <row>
>           <entry><constant>V4L2_EVENT_CTRL_CH_FLAGS</constant></entry>
> diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-queryctrl.xml 
> b/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-queryctrl.xml
> index 2bd98fd..d389292 100644
> --- a/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-queryctrl.xml
> +++ b/Documentation/DocBook/media/v4l/vidioc-queryctrl.xml
> @@ -599,8 +599,11 @@ writing a value will cause the device to carry out a 
> given action
>           <entry>This control is volatile, which means that the value of the 
> control
>  changes continuously. A typical example would be the current gain value if 
> the device
>  is in auto-gain mode. In such a case the hardware calculates the gain value 
> based on
> -the lighting conditions which can change over time. Note that setting a new 
> value for
> -a volatile control will have no effect. The new value will just be 
> ignored.</entry>
> +the lighting conditions which can change over time. Another example would be 
> an error
> +flag (missed trigger, invalid voltage on the sensor). In those situations 
> the user
> +could write to the control to acknowledge the error, but that write will 
> never
> +generate a <constant>V4L2_EVENT_CTRL_CH_VALUE</constant> event and the flag
> +<constant>V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_EXECUTE_ON_WRITE</constant> must be set.<entry>

I am not really happy with this change. In particular this dropped the "Note 
that setting
a new value for a volatile control will have no effect. The new value will just 
be ignored.".

This is still true as long as EXECUTE_ON_WRITE isn't set.

I would keep the original sentence, but add something like: "will have no 
effect and
no <constant>V4L2_EVENT_CTRL_CH_VALUE</constant> will be sent, unless
the <constant>V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_EXECUTE_ON_WRITE</constant> flag (see below) is 
also set.
Otherwise the new value will just be ignored."

And just skip the trigger example since that's already described in the 
EXECUTE_ON_WRITE
documentation.

>         </row>
>         <row>
>           <entry><constant>V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_HAS_PAYLOAD</constant></entry>
> @@ -610,6 +613,14 @@ using one of the pointer fields of &v4l2-ext-control;. 
> This flag is set for cont
>  that are an array, string, or have a compound type. In all cases you have to 
> set a
>  pointer to memory containing the payload of the control.</entry>
>         </row>
> +       <row>
> +         <entry><constant>V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_EXECUTE_ON_WRITE</constant></entry>
> +         <entry>0x0200</entry>
> +         <entry>The value provided to the control will be propagated to the 
> driver
> +even if remains constant. This is required when the controls represents an 
> action

s/controls/control/

> +on the hardware. For example: clearing an error flag or triggering the 
> flash. All the
> +controls of the type <constant>V4L2_CTRL_TYPE_BUTTON</constant> have this 
> flag set.</entry>
> +       </row>
>       </tbody>
>        </tgroup>
>      </table>
> diff --git a/Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-controls.txt 
> b/Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-controls.txt
> index 0f84ce8..5517db6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-controls.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/video4linux/v4l2-controls.txt
> @@ -344,7 +344,9 @@ implement g_volatile_ctrl like this:
>       }
>  
>  Note that you use the 'new value' union as well in g_volatile_ctrl. In 
> general
> -controls that need to implement g_volatile_ctrl are read-only controls.
> +controls that need to implement g_volatile_ctrl are read-only controls. If 
> they
> +are not, a V4L2_EVENT_CTRL_CH_VALUE will not be generated when the control
> +changes.
>  
>  To mark a control as volatile you have to set V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_VOLATILE:
>  
> 

Regards,

        Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to