On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 06:47:18PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > This patch not tested. I assume that firmware save/restore cp15 > context, i.e. it doesn't require switching to LE before smc call and > restore endianness after.
That assumption should be valid. However, I think this patch must be tested before assuming it is correct. If the arguments were passed in memory then there might force LE order for that data block, but there should not be a need for this if the values are in registers. Cheers ---Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
