On 03/20/2015 12:56 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk> writes:

On 03/19/2015 03:27 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 03/19/2015 03:00 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:58:33PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
Do you really want to do memory allocation in the exit path?  That
sounds like a bad idea to me.  (Of course, now you're going to point out
all the places that currently happens, right?  ;-)

I think we just need a counter there - let everyone count down as they
exit and the last one trigger the completion, no?

Yeah that's a good point, that'd be cleaner too. I'll change it and test
that.

Here's a cleaner variant that pairs the completion even with an atomic
count. Works for me as well.

I like this version.  I ran it though the libaio test harness and
xfstests aio tests and it passed.

Thanks, Jens!

Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmo...@redhat.com>

Thanks for testing, Jeff! I'll send out a proper patch with your reviewed-by as well.

--
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to