On 23/03/15 16:59, Lee Jones wrote: > On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Pavel Machek wrote: > >> > On Mon 2015-03-23 15:02:13, Lee Jones wrote: >>> > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Pavel Machek wrote: >>>> > > > On Mon 2015-03-23 12:07:43, Lee Jones wrote: >>>>> > > > > This patch requires a DT Ack. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > No, it requires DT people to be notified -- and they were, few times >>>> > > > by now. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > They clearly don't care. >>> > > >>> > > Well fortunately for the Kernel community, I do care. And as this >>> > > patch adds 3 new DT properties, has been through many iterations >>> > > already with vast changes made over that period and there is still >>> > > some controversy looming, I'm saying that it _does_ require a DT >>> > > Ack. >> > >> > Can you help get that ack, then? As a maintainer, you have better >> > chance getting reply from DT people than patch submitter. > > Hopefully they will see my plea a couple of replies back. > > If that fails I'll go poke them via other means. Failing that I'll go > see them in person and continually hit them with wet fish until one of > them relents.
Nice, as we can see it doesn't take _that_ much to be a really good subsystem maintainer. I wish you good luck and hope there will be no need to realize the very last steps of that clever plan. -- Regards, Sylwester -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
