When an MTRR entry is inclusive to a requested range, i.e.
the start and end of the request are not within the MTRR
entry range but the range contains the MTRR entry entirely,
__mtrr_type_lookup() ignores such a case because both
start_state and end_state are set to zero.

This bug can cause the following issues:
1) reserve_memtype() tracks an effective memory type in case
   a request type is WB (ex. /dev/mem blindly uses WB). Missing
   to track with its effective type causes a subsequent request
   to map the same range with the effective type to fail.
2) pud_set_huge() and pmd_set_huge() check if a requested range
   has any overlap with MTRRs. Missing to detect an overlap may
   cause a performance penalty or undefined behavior.

This patch fixes the bug by adding a new flag, 'inclusive',
to detect the inclusive case.  This case is then handled in
the same way as (!start_state && end_state).  With this fix,
__mtrr_type_lookup() handles the inclusive case properly.

Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.k...@hp.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c |   17 +++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c 
b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c
index 7d74f7b..a82e370 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static u8 __mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end, u64 
*partial_end, int *repeat)
 
        prev_match = 0xFF;
        for (i = 0; i < num_var_ranges; ++i) {
-               unsigned short start_state, end_state;
+               unsigned short start_state, end_state, inclusive;
 
                if (!(mtrr_state.var_ranges[i].mask_lo & (1 << 11)))
                        continue;
@@ -166,15 +166,16 @@ static u8 __mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end, u64 
*partial_end, int *repeat)
 
                start_state = ((start & mask) == (base & mask));
                end_state = ((end & mask) == (base & mask));
+               inclusive = ((start < base) && (end > base));
 
-               if (start_state != end_state) {
+               if ((start_state != end_state) || inclusive) {
                        /*
                         * We have start:end spanning across an MTRR.
-                        * We split the region into
-                        * either
-                        * (start:mtrr_end) (mtrr_end:end)
-                        * or
-                        * (start:mtrr_start) (mtrr_start:end)
+                        * We split the region into either
+                        * - start_state:1
+                        *     (start:mtrr_end) (mtrr_end:end)
+                        * - end_state:1 or inclusive:1
+                        *     (start:mtrr_start) (mtrr_start:end)
                         * depending on kind of overlap.
                         * Return the type for first region and a pointer to
                         * the start of second region so that caller will
@@ -195,7 +196,7 @@ static u8 __mtrr_type_lookup(u64 start, u64 end, u64 
*partial_end, int *repeat)
                        *repeat = 1;
                }
 
-               if ((start & mask) != (base & mask))
+               if (!start_state)
                        continue;
 
                curr_match = mtrr_state.var_ranges[i].base_lo & 0xff;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to