On Wednesday, March 25, 2015 01:04:23 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi, > > On Monday, February 16, 2015 01:14:35 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > Hi, > > > > While working with Rafael on the suspend to idle machinery Thomas made these > > cleanups; since one might as well clean code up while you've done the work > > of > > thinking through it again. > > > > As it stands there's very little overlap between Rafael's series and this > > one > > aside from a few trivial fixups. So we'll merge them seperately. > > Since some of the original Thomas' patches needed to be rebased on top of the > suspend-to-idle material that went in during the 4.0 merge window, I did > that with the patches related to the suspending/resuming of ticks which > follow.
I forgot to mention that I'd tested these vs suspend-to-idle and suspend-to-RAM on a couple of different systems and they don't seem to break anything for me. Also I have a plan to make the compilation of some PM-related stuff conditional on CONFIG_PM_SLEEP etc. on top of these. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
