On Tuesday 26 July 2005 21:50, Steven Rostedt wrote: >On Tue, 2005-07-26 at 21:28 -0400, Kurt Wall wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 12:38:43PM -0400, Brian Gerst took 21 lines to write: >> > Gene Heskett wrote: >> > >Greetings; >> > > >> > >I just built what I thought was 2.6.12.3, but my script got a >> > > tummy ache because I didn't check the Makefile's >> > > EXTRA_VERSION, which was set to .2 in the .2 patch. Now my >> > > 2.6.12 modules will need a refresh build. :( >> > > >> > >So whats the proper patching sequence to build a 2.6.12.3? >> > >> > The dot-release patches are not incremental. You apply each one >> > to the base 2.6.12 tree. >> >> This bit me a while back, too. I'll submit a patch to the >> top-level README to spell it out. > >Someone should also fix the home page of kernel.org. Since there's > no link on that page that points to the full 2.6.12. Since a lot of > the patches on that page go directly against the 2.6.12 kernel and > not 2.6.12.3, it would be nice to get the full source of that > kernel from the home page. > Apparently you are useing a browser to suck that stuff? Use gftp and walk right up the dir structure to it. Its not hidden at all that way.
-- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) 99.35% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly Yahoo.com and AOL/TW attorneys please note, additions to the above message by Gene Heskett are: Copyright 2005 by Maurice Eugene Heskett, all rights reserved. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/