On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 09:03:38AM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 3/25/15 7:24 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >So it starts when there are tons of threads in the system, for which
> >synthezing from /proc will have to take place, without looking again at
> >that patch, I can't think about what would be a problem :-\
> 
> 3 extra lines are read from /proc/pid/status:
> 
> Name: bash
> State:        S (sleeping)
> Tgid: 6046
> 
> < current patch breaks here>
> 
> Ngid: 0
> Pid:  6046
> PPid: 6045
> 
> < my patch reads these 3 lines, repeats the memcmp and does an atoi
> on the PPid: value >

Ah, I read my email out of order.  So you figured out the extra latency.
Nice.  In that case I think I am ok with your V2, though I still think split
it out would make sense.

Sorry about that.  Thanks for quickly debugging that!!

Cheers,
Don

> 
> Let me remove that loop by reading in 4k at a time and making a
> single pass. That should bring down the overhead, but filling in the
> ppid will add some.
> 
> David
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to