On 03/26/2015 02:28 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 07:37:40PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
>> That would be true only for
>>
>>      ptr = mempool_alloc(gfp, pool);
>>      mempool_free(ptr, pool);
>>
>> and nothing in between, and that's pretty pointless.  Typically, callers 
>> allocate memory, modify it, and then free it.  When that happens with 
>> mempools, and we can't allocate slab because of the gfp context, mempools 
>> will return elements in the state in which they were freed (modified, not 
>> as constructed).
> 
> The historic slab allocator (Solaris and early Linux) expects objects
> to be returned in the same / similar enough form as the constructor
> returned it, and the constructor is only called when allocating pages
> from the page pool.

I'm pretty sure that this was the intention of the jfs code. Returned
objects should have these fields returned to their initial values. It
does seem error-prone, though. If jfs is in fact the last user of the
constructor, it's probably time for it to die.

> 
> I have to admit that I haven't used this feature forever, and I have no idea 
> if
> people changed how the allocator works in the meantime.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to