On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Scott Branden <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On 15-03-22 06:20 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> >> On 03/20/2015 08:06 PM, Scott Branden wrote: >>> >>> This patchset attempts to standardize the naming of dt-bindings >>> documents based on the Broadcom vendor prefix of brcm. >>> >>> Although there are no guidelines currently present for how to name >>> the dt-bindings document the "vendor,binding.txt" style is in use by >>> some of the other vendors. >>> >>> Acked-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]> >>> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]> >>> Acked-by: Gregory Fong <[email protected]> >>> Acked-by: Stephen Warren <[email protected]> >>> Signed-off-by: Scott Branden <[email protected]> >> >> >> Version history would be nice... > > Yes, I should have added a cover letter but didn't. The difference between > versions was minimal: a spelling correction in the commit message text and a > few additional binding files were found that were added between the > versions, along with the Ack's. > >> >> Who did you want to apply this? I can, but I'm worried about merge >> conflicts here. Hopefully, you're not also doing lots of changes to >> existing bindings. > > > Yes, it would be great for you to take care of applying this. There > shouldn't be any merge conflicts as none of these bindings are currently > being updated. I left a clock binding document out of this patchset at Ray > Jui is updating/renaming the documentation for that binding in a different > patch already.
Okay, thanks. I've applied it. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
