On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 09:48:52PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hi Jiri, > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 01:49:07PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 01:21:08PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:22:20PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 10:07:37AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > > > > > > SNIP > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2 things: > > > > > > 1. let run for a long time. go about using the server. do lots of > > > > > > builds, > > > > > > etc. it takes time > > > > > > > > > > > > 2. use a box with a LOT of cpus (1024 in my case) > > > > > > > > > > > > Make sure ulimit is set to get the core. > > > > > > > > > > reproduced under 24 cpu box with kernel build (make -j25) > > > > > running on background.. will try to look closer > > > > > > > > > > perf: Segmentation fault > > > > > -------- backtrace -------- > > > > > ./perf[0x4fd79b] > > > > > /lib64/libc.so.6(+0x358f0)[0x7f9cbff528f0] > > > > > ./perf(thread__put+0x5b)[0x4b1a7b] > > > > > ./perf(hists__delete_entries+0x70)[0x4c8670] > > > > > ./perf[0x436a88] > > > > > ./perf[0x4fa73d] > > > > > ./perf(perf_evlist__tui_browse_hists+0x97)[0x4fc437] > > > > > ./perf[0x4381d0] > > > > > /lib64/libpthread.so.0(+0x7ee5)[0x7f9cc1ff2ee5] > > > > > /lib64/libc.so.6(clone+0x6d)[0x7f9cc0011b8d] > > > > > [0x0] > > > > > > > > looks like race among __machine__findnew_thread and thread__put > > > > over the machine->threads rb_tree insert/removal > > > > > > > > is there a reason why thread__put does not erase itself from > > > > machine->threads? > > > > that was the reason.. we do this separately.. not in thread__put.. > > is there a reason for this? ;-) > > > > testing attached patch.. > > > > jirka > > > > > > --- > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/build-id.c b/tools/perf/util/build-id.c > > index f7fb258..966564a 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/build-id.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/build-id.c > > @@ -60,7 +60,6 @@ static int perf_event__exit_del_thread(struct perf_tool > > *tool __maybe_unused, > > event->fork.ppid, event->fork.ptid); > > > > if (thread) { > > - rb_erase(&thread->rb_node, &machine->threads); > > if (machine->last_match == thread) > > thread__zput(machine->last_match); > > thread__put(thread); > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c > > index e335330..a8443ef 100644 > > --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c > > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ int machine__init(struct machine *machine, const char > > *root_dir, pid_t pid) > > dsos__init(&machine->kernel_dsos); > > > > machine->threads = RB_ROOT; > > + pthread_mutex_init(&machine->threads_lock, NULL); > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&machine->dead_threads); > > machine->last_match = NULL; > > > > @@ -380,10 +381,13 @@ static struct thread > > *__machine__findnew_thread(struct machine *machine, > > if (!create) > > return NULL; > > > > - th = thread__new(pid, tid); > > + th = thread__new(machine, pid, tid); > > if (th != NULL) { > > + > > + pthread_mutex_lock(&machine->threads_lock); > > rb_link_node(&th->rb_node, parent, p); > > rb_insert_color(&th->rb_node, &machine->threads); > > + pthread_mutex_unlock(&machine->threads_lock); > > I think you also need to protect the rb tree traversal above.
yep, I already have another version.. but it blows on another place ;-) > > But this makes every sample processing grabs and releases the lock so > might cause high overhead. It can be a problem if such processing is > done parallelly like my multi-thread work. :-/ yep.. perhaps instead of more locking we need to find a way where only single thread do the update on hists/threads jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/