On Mon 23-03-15 02:11:49, Changwoo Min wrote:
> There is no check for udf_tgetblk(), which could return NULL, in 
> udf_symlink(). 
> So there is a possibility of returning NULL under heavy memory pressure and 
> possibility of NULL dereference. 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Changwoo Min <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/udf/namei.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/udf/namei.c b/fs/udf/namei.c
> index 33b246b..ed2f221 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/namei.c
> @@ -902,6 +902,10 @@ static int udf_symlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry 
> *dentry,
>                               iinfo->i_location.partitionReferenceNum,
>                               0);
>               epos.bh = udf_tgetblk(sb, block);
> +             if (!epos.bh) {
> +                     err = -ENOMEM;
  This should be -EIO as per our discussion at the previous patch.
Otherwise I agree.

                                                                Honza

> +                     goto out_no_entry;
> +             }
>               lock_buffer(epos.bh);
>               memset(epos.bh->b_data, 0x00, bsize);
>               set_buffer_uptodate(epos.bh);
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to