> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcoch...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2015 2:53 PM > To: net...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Amir Vadai; Ariel Elior; Arnd Bergmann; > Baolin Wang; Ben Hutchings; Allan, Bruce W; Wyborny, Carolyn; Chris > Metcalf; David Miller; Frank Li; Giuseppe Cavallaro; Keller, Jacob E; Kirsher, > Jeffrey T; John Stultz; Luwei Zhou; Vick, Matthew; Michael Chan; Prashant > Sreedharan; Rayagond K; Shradha Shah; Solarflare linux maintainers; Sonic > Zhang; Stefan Sørensen; Thomas Gleixner; Tom Lendacky > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V3 13/23] ptp: igb: convert to the 64 bit > get/set time methods. > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:12:03PM +0200, Richard Cochran wrote: > > > @@ -627,11 +628,11 @@ static void igb_ptp_overflow_check(struct > work_struct *work) > > { > > struct igb_adapter *igb = > > container_of(work, struct igb_adapter, > ptp_overflow_work.work); > > - struct timespec ts; > > + struct timespec64 ts; > > > > - igb->ptp_caps.gettime(&igb->ptp_caps, &ts); > > + igb->ptp_caps.gettime64(&igb->ptp_caps, &ts); > > > > - pr_debug("igb overflow check at %ld.%09lu\n", ts.tv_sec, > ts.tv_nsec); > > + pr_debug("igb overflow check at %lld.%09lu\n", ts.tv_sec, > ts.tv_nsec); > > For a 64 bit build, this produces the same warning as e1000e. > > What is the best way to deal with this warning? > > Thanks, > Richard
I don't know how kernel would fix this. Usually macros like PRI64d are used but I am not sure those are defined for the kernel builds Regards, Jake -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
