Ingo noted there was no reason to pass the timekeeper structure
to timekeeping_check_update(), and the tk_read_base would be fine,
which simplifies the amount of dereferencing to get to values we
care about.

So this patch simply changes the function as suggested.

Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <pra...@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcoch...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org>
---
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index fe91e8e..676896e 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -131,11 +131,11 @@ static int timekeeping_overflow_seen;
 /* last_warning is only modified under the timekeeping lock */
 static long timekeeping_last_warning;
 
-static void timekeeping_check_update(struct timekeeper *tk, cycle_t offset)
+static void timekeeping_check_update(struct tk_read_base *tkr, cycle_t offset)
 {
 
-       cycle_t max_cycles = tk->tkr_mono.clock->max_cycles;
-       const char *name = tk->tkr_mono.clock->name;
+       cycle_t max_cycles = tkr->clock->max_cycles;
+       const char *name = tkr->clock->name;
 
        if (offset > max_cycles) {
                printk_deferred("WARNING: timekeeping: Cycle offset (%lld) is 
larger than allowed by the '%s' clock's max_cycles value (%lld): time overflow 
danger\n",
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ static inline cycle_t timekeeping_get_delta(struct 
tk_read_base *tkr)
        return delta;
 }
 #else
-static inline void timekeeping_check_update(struct timekeeper *tk, cycle_t 
offset)
+static inline void timekeeping_check_update(struct tk_read_base *tkr, cycle_t 
offset)
 {
 }
 static inline cycle_t timekeeping_get_delta(struct tk_read_base *tkr)
@@ -1794,7 +1794,7 @@ void update_wall_time(void)
                goto out;
 
        /* Do some additional sanity checking */
-       timekeeping_check_update(real_tk, offset);
+       timekeeping_check_update(&real_tk->tkr_mono, offset);
 
        /*
         * With NO_HZ we may have to accumulate many cycle_intervals
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to